fast file site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only must be in a folder.

You have to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you will need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. 웹하드 순위 There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity is the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.