photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
Holland Shoaf | all galleries >> Galleries >> Questionable Doctrines and other neat stuff > Genesis 6 - The sons of Seth or Fallen angels ?
previous | next

Genesis 6 - The sons of Seth or Fallen angels ?

This work is being updated ever so often !
please visit this link for an overview of the study..

1. Sons of God
2. The Great Flood.
3. Giants
4 Wives
5. Return of the days of Noah
6.. Nebucanezzers Dream (intermingling with the seed of men)
7.Book of Enoch
8. Wiping out the Satans genepool
9.calling on the name of Jesus CE4

This study is dedicated to Pastor Doug Bachelor. A very wise pastor with Amazing Facts Ministry. I love listening to their program called Bible Answers Live. OFTEN you will hear people call in and ask about the Sons of God in Genesis 6. Evidently people are wanting to know about UFO's and Alien abductions which are rampant in the news , and these callers come to the show for answers. However they are left with more questions about the phenomena than answers due to a very dry, shallow and WRONGFUL insight into the subject. In fact Pastor Doug claims the this theory of the Sons of God being fallen angels is a relatively new approach on the Genesis 6 scripture. You will read soon with overwhelming evidence that this is not true. The Sons of Seth view that he gives came AFTER the fallen angel view. A complete fabrication on his part. He claims the giants (Nephilim) of Genesis came from the outcome of " Genetic Vitality".
He says the Sons of Seth were Godly men who married " Daughters of men " who were ungodly daughters. I say its strange that one group are only males ( all Godly ) and the other group are only females ( all ungodly ). Right from the start we have a problem with common sensible thinking. Where are the females from the first group and the males from the second group ? He doesnt cover that. How do these groups perpetuate themselves with only one sex from each group intermingling (sexually) with the other ? Even more ludicrous is how he uses an irrational analogy to explain this strange character of peoeple ( the Nephilim ). He says certain species of animals mating with other animals of similar species will create a new breed of animal. Like the tiger and lion (of the cat family) creating a big Liger, or a horse and a donkey creating a strong mule .
However he doesnt mention that what he is doing is comparing different breeds of animals with each other which produce a different breed of offspring.
He wants the callers of his show to believe that the same applies to human beings !!! Different breeds of dog mating for example will produce a different animal not looking exactly like either parent. This is what one would call a wrongful comparison. One group of people who follow God who have sex with a one group who do not follow God DO not produce GIANTS or evil fallen beings worthy of having a name for themselves ( men of reknown/nephilim ). If you get a chance ask Pastor Doug this question . " Why doesnt the bible just speak out and say the sons of Seth married daughters of Cain / or men " ? The bible clearly doesnt refrain using personal names or names of nations !
In fact if Pastor Bachelor is correct then we are still left asking " what are these UFOS and alien abductions about "? If they dont exist at all, then what in heavens name is going on ? Is this mass hysteria in which their is an eerie central them about them ? He has one theory which is has created a website on
He actually claims there is intelligent life on other worlds and that these Sons of God were representing those UNFALLEN worlds while Satan was representing ours !!!! Its the craziest thing I have ever heard ! The bible does not say this. It is a hypothesis based on very little information , when in actuality the bible says ALOT about what is really taken place. What the bible does say in Romans 8:22 is that the whole of creation has been affected by sin which is in complete contradiction of Pastor Dougs " unfallen worlds doctrine " - Romans *:22 For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.. If sin separated every living thing that had a moral conscious and the ability to sin against God, and took on the sin of Adam as taught in the bible, then there are NO unfallen worlds. Only Heaven were God and the unfallen ANGELS dwell.
Please allow me to invite you to my study below.
This is a surmise of something I have been studying for years and what I believe is behind the alien abduction phenomona. After years of documentation from tens of thousands of UFO reports, an ugly picture is being painted as to what is going on. The UFO subject is overwhelmed with avenues that could implore one to spend years reading without actually ingesting whats taken place. I am presenting just one. It appears that biblical prophecy is coming to light with the alien abduction scenario. The great deception that is coming upon the world, just at the onset of Jesus calling up his church. I present the facts, you can agree or not. This is all just food for thought. This work is in the making, unfinished. My work is on bible references to alien abductions.

The sons of God . -
UFOs and alien abductions. You often see the subject in movies and sometimes in the news. The big question is , are they for real ? With the thousands of sightings each year, often from very reputable people who have nothing to gain but lots to lose because of what they report to have seen or experienced makes one wonder. UFOs have been recorded in paintings from as far back as 300 BC and etched in hyroglyphic pictures in pyramids and caves many years before that. My reason is not to prove UFOs are real but to examine what evidence there may be behind the phenomona. If you were to spend just a few hours on the subject of UFOs, you would become at least partially convinced that what people are seeing is something out of the ordinary. If all these reports are bogus than what on earth is happening to the minds of people and why ? Regardless I ask " than what on earth is happening "? Allow me to state I have spent years studying the subject and continually do so today. Being someone who studies the bible, I found there is a probable connection between the two. Yes there are strange vehicles flying around in the bible too !
Certainly if something as profound as visitors from outside our world are visiting our planet, one would assume that the bible would comment on it. I mean after all we are talking about possible life outside our normal realm of thinking. If such life does exist and if we assume all life is created by our God of the bible , then surely HE would make note of it ! I would hope our God would give us answers if we should experience "something" so strange and disturbing as beings who abduct humans and using them for genetic manipulation. If UFOs and aliens are real, certainly there would be biblical implications and references ! Im not going to give an unbias view on the subject. I have been convinced alien abductions are taking place and my intentions are to show you what I believe is the reason behind them. Im not a new ager, spiritualist, evolutionist and not easily persuaded without lots of investigation. In fact Im skeptical about most things and question biblical things to see if they are so ( Acts 17:11 ).
I believe the bible is the inherit Word of God without mistakes. In short I believe what the bible says. Through much studying I believe the bible to be true and accurate. With that said and with my hopes that God has made mention of what may be biblical references to the ufo phenomona, that is the place I searched for answers. When we find things in the bible that are outside our " box" of thinking, what do we do with it? Does such things diminish what we believe about the bible or does it fortify our beliefs ? Will it change who we think God is or who we believe we are ? The UFO phenomona has greatly enhanced my belief in God and His Word, and most interestingly the prophecies that are foretold in the bible that are soon to come !
Lets begin studying in the first book of the bible where there is an obvious reference to something very strange ( Genesis ) chapter 6:2 : That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.3: And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. ( Notice they TOOK " wives against their will )? Its was NOT a union that was mutually agree upon !

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. There has been a lot of controversy about this one section of the bible about who the sons of God were. If you search for sons of God in the Old Testament, you will find them 5 times. Gen 6:2, 6:4, Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7 . Four of them sound obviously like bad beings, and the last one appears to be contrarily good. A strange contrast to reckon with. You may ask why are we going here ? What is there to learn about understanding the first book of the bible ? The term Sons of God is Hebrew B'nai HaElohim. This same phrase only appears in a few passages such as Job 1:6, 2:1 and 38:7. All of these passages refer to the B'nai HaElohim as angels ! The Septuigent is a greek translation of the old testament . The B'nai Elohim in Genesis 6 is translated as angels having relations with the daughters of men whose offspring were giants !
Wait a minute, Ive been told that angels cant reproduce. What does the bible say about that ? In Mathew 22:30 Jesus was answering the Sadducees about marriage in heaven. Jesus said.. "For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven". This passage is often regarded as a reference to this topic but notice that Jesus is specifically speaking of the angels of God. Not the angels whose alliance is given to Satan. And there is no mention in scripture ( including this passage ) about the incapabilities of the fallen angels. ( we will talk about the angels given themselves over to fornication shortly ).
Mathew 22:28-30 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven? for they all had her.Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. And consider this passage while studying the passage in Mathew; Jude:1:6: And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.
No one ever reflects on these specifics in these passages. The verse says " IN THE RESURRECTION" !!!! According to bible prophecy, the rescurrection has not happened yet so fallen angels are null and void of the resurrection rule. And one more point to touch. The scriptures say ( angels IN heaven ), not those OUTSIDE of heaven ( who left their first estate ) And what about the angels of God who left their first estate ( Jude:1:6:) ? The bible says " OF GOD ". These fallen angels of heaven who left their first estate were not OF GOD. These angels were now not OF God, but OF Satan. All these defining terms describe angels who were not on " Gods side ".
Jude:1:6: And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Freaky ! These angels did not keep their first estate but left their own habitation ( heaven ) are now reserved in everlasting chains. " Doomed for hell ". These beings that fell from heaven left their angelic spiritual nature and took on flesh !!!! What are you trying to tell me these angels turned into fleshly beings ?
Continue onward to Jude 1:7 , Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Verse 7 seems to be a continuance of verse 6..... """" even as """"... and continuing.
These angels have given themselves over to fornication ( like those in Sodom and Gomorrah ) by going after strange flesh. No I am not yanking a verse out of context. I am adding this verse with Genesis chapter 6 and the Book of Enochs claim . They appear to paint a vivid picture.
If something freaky wasnt taken place at this time, why wasnt these scriptures written like this ? Genesis 6:1 And it came to pass, when men and women began to multiply on the face of the earth, and sons and daughters were born unto them,
6:2 That the sons and daughters of God saw the sons and daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them husbands and wives of all which they chose.
But the scriptures were not written like that, and to note all angels in the bible have a masculine name attached to them. I believe that is the first inclination that something strange took place in Gen 6.
In fact 18 times in the old testament " sons and daughters " had children but only in Gen 6, did these sons and daughter have children that were given the strange name " Nephilim ", Mighty Men ! People with differing moral values do not produce children who have "abnormal" characteristics of physical stature.
In Gen 6, for the last 1500 years most evangelical scholars have interpreted the sons of God were the good sons of Seth and the daughers of men were the daughters of Cain. They've adopted that interpretation because the other was too bizarre and outlandish for them to accept. It did not fit their " in the box " thinking of God, angels and demons. But the ancient and first interpretation was that the sons of God were demonic beings or falling angels that came to earth, lusted after the daughters of men , married them, and produced an amazing hybrid offspring called the Nephilim. The very word Nephilim does not mean giants like many will say, it comes from the root word Nephile meaning " falling ones ". The early Christian fathers in the first 4 centuries, men like Flavius Josephus, Philo, Eusebius and many of the "Ante-Nicene Fathers," including Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Tertullian, Irenaeus, Athenagoras, Commodianus, Iorouneus, Totorilion , Amborose, Justin, Athenagoras, Cyprian, Eusebius, Josephus, Philo, Judeau and Apoocrypha for 400 years knew no other interpretation except the sons of God were angelic beings.
In the 5th century the angel view of Genesis 6 came under attack by critics. Celsus and Julian the Apostate used the traditional angel view to attack Christianity. Augustine also used the ( Godly Sethite) view/theory and it prevailed through the middle ages. The Sethite view is littered with flaws and does not hold up to simple scrutiny. For instance, if the Sethites were so righteous, why did they all perish in the great flood, and how do human bloodlines produce beings worthy of having titles such as " The Nephilim " and Giants ? Some would like to say the word "giant " means mighty men or super strong or intelligent. But read the bible please and you will see examples given along with references to height and great stature in many areas.
Another problem with the Sethite view of Genesis is that you cant call the Sethites Godly because all groups of peoples have good and bad people. Just because you were born of a certain person, does not mean you will be referred to by God as a godly man ! Also avoided by Sethite theorists is the undeniable fact that a " group " of beings took wives of whom they chose; not women who agreed on being " married ". Isnt it strange that these so called Sethites were all MALES such as ALL the angels in heaven referred to by masculine names !
The sons of Seth view not only conceal the sin of fallen angels in Noahs day but without a clear understanding of Genesis 6 one does not stand a chance at seeing what the mystery of iniquity is planning in secret for this ( our ) generation when reading preceding scripture throughout the bible.

Is the evidence overwhelming that the sons of God were really fallen angels who interbred with women of the earth ? A very interesting note to observe in Gen 6 about the daughters of men is the reference to the word " MEN ". Daughters of MEN. Take note that this verse does not say daughters of a tribe, group, generation, family, belief system but MEN. Daughters of MEN. Think about it. Why would God use the word "men" if he needed to be more specific as describing a group of people such as those with a certain belief system or moral character ? Because he was making a contrast observation. God was contrasting the fact that HE was talking about humans and non humans marrying. Non men in comparision to men. This is a pretty stiff accuscation right ? Lets continue. Are you thinking that these fallen angels looked like the ugly demons you have been taught to imagine them being ? Maybe you think Satan is red with a pitchfork, horns and a tail or some who might look like lizard men ? If you will study about angels you will see that angelic beings can present themselves in such a way that they could even fool yourself into you thinking their your next door neighbor ! Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares". If you were unaware a human was an angel, then any angel can pose as the guy sitting next to you on the bus ! Where is it written that fallen angels do not have the ability to look like any one of us ? If Satan can come to us as an angel of light (2Cor:11:14) to decieve us, wouldnt it be in his best interest that he present himself as one of us ? I'm forced to assume that a demon can materialize as a human just as a good angel can ? Is this just a ridiculous assumption ? Read the account of three angels sitting and EATING with Abraham in Genesis 17 and tell me what you think !
For those who still insist that the sons of God are godly men or those "saved" lets look into the verses Job:38:4-7 and see if we can gather an understanding of who the sons of God are.
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?
Who were the sons of God that shouted for joy ? Obviously they couldnt have been the decendants from the line of Seth because NO MAN HAD BEEN CREATED WHEN THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE EARTH WERE LAID !! Bing bang boom, we now have evidence that the bible can call something other than the descendants of Seth the "sons of God" ! But continue reading and the bible will pinpoint exactly who these sons of God are that took themselves wives of all they chose from the daughters of men.
If the sons of God and daughters of men were simply mixed marriages ( of belief systems and/or values) between bad men and good women , it is suprising that God would issue the proud judgment of worldwide extermination that he did. God rightly killed the worlds population but for a remnant. Drowned them all. Where any of them in these lands redeemable ?
Here are two things to consider when talking about the angelic view in comparison to the godly sons of Seth view.. The Sons of God could only be fallen angels in Genesis 6. Why ? Because Adam was called the son of God because he was a direct creation of God, everyone else was the son of man UNTIL Jesus died for the sins of mankind, where as those who were reborn through his ( Jesus ) redemption could be born again unto a new creature and then they would become ( and called ) sons of God. They became sons of God when they were saved ( John 1:12 ) No one but Adam and the angels ( including fallen angels ) could be sons of God BEFORE the soul saving resurrection of Jesus Christ. Sons of God represented one of two things. A direct creation of God which was Adam and angels, the other was born again believers.
2. The Great Flood
God took a stern action to wipe out most of the human race. Gen:6:7: And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them. Lets look at what happened if fallen angels did intermarry with the daughters of men. What was the result ? What did God do because of this result ? Something happened to mankind at this point , something beyond the hypothetical " good men and sinful women" mixing scenario. Since then their have been evil women and good men, evil men and good women, evil with evil and good with good......all sorts of intermarrying between the sexes at all levels of morality and the same goes on today. But God has only once wiped out the worlds population ( except Noah and family ). God has never brought but once the world wide judgement he did as the one in Genesis. Buy why destroy the worlds populas because sin abounded back then ? Those days are like these days arent they ? Turn on the news and you will see my evidence. Those days are a perfect representation of any time in history; and more so are these days we live in ! Why hasnt a recurring judgement such as the one in the days of Noah taken place a second time if it is all about sin abounding in the hearts of man " ?
Looking forward into the account of Noah, there could be some insight into this mystery. Please read the story of Noah. Genesis chapters 6-9.
Its very strange to note that God mentioned Noah ( before the flood ) being perfect in his generations. Perfect you say ? Is there such a thing as a perfect man ? Perfect without sin like Jesus was ? Of course not ! Noah was not a sinless man. The bible says all men have sinned and come short of the Glory of God ( Romans 3:23 ). What was special about Noah that God would save him and his family ? First of all God says he was a just man ( meaning justified in the sight of God ) but thats not all that God said. If Noah was justified we know that initial sin (Rom 5:12) would bring him a bodily death but God mysteriously included that he was perfect in his generations. There is no need to save Noah from a bodily death because ALL MEN HAVE SINNED AND WILL DIE ! ( Heb 9:27) Why did God say Noah was perfect IN HIS GENERATIONS ?
The only people that God used to repopulate the world was Noahs family. Noah wasnt sinless. He was born of sin and a sinner like the rest of mankind...however God said he was a " just " man and "PERFECT" in his generations. The word in this case does not mean morally perfect. In fact the bible tells us clearly that Noah was not a morally perfect man. Perfect in this sense means to be perfect without blemish. Like a lamb to be sacrificed .Ex:12:5, 29:1, Lev 1:3 etc.... A lamb with no spots or defects. A thoroughbred so to speak. Genetically pure. This indication is very strange. The only person that was on earth that had not been contaminated from these strange beings in Genesis 6 was Noah and only then was his family spared because they were "family" and were needed to repopulate the earth. ( will read more on that later ). One would have to assume the entire earth was contaminated with nephilim or at least humans with the genetic code ( seed ) ( recessive or/and dominant) from those fallen sons of God ! Not even Noahs family who boarded the Ark with him was said to be perfect because after the flood giants and strange beings were seen on the earth during and after that ( Just like the bible said there would be !!! ) Refrer back to Gen 6:4 in those days and also AFTER that !
Why has there been an attack on the genetic line in the human race from fallen angels ( which of course includes Satan) ? Could it be the jealousy of Satan ? That could well be the answer or part of it. If you read the bible you will see an underlying attack on a certain bloodline that was foretold to usher in the Messiah. Gen 3:14: And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. And I will put enmity ( WAR/STRIFE) between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel. Well its again so interesting that we have the " SEED " of Satan mentioned, but lets take a break from that now and concentrate on the war beween good and evil ( Eph:6:12). Yes I would imagine Satan is jealous of Gods creation seeing that mankind was the center of Gods affection.
Since Lucifer was Gods most high angel and having been cast out of heaven I could see some animosity toward the human race ! If not jealousy, you can assume Satan simply wanted revenge on God in probably the most devious way he could devise. I assume that is the main reason why Satan came to tempt Eve, to seperate God and his creation and subsequently all of mankind. Another theory and this one can coincide with the previous one, Satan knows his destiny. He also knew the promise of The Messiah and was told the promise of God soon after he was held accountable for his action of deceiving Eve. ( the womans heel and bruising the serpents head story ). Corrupting and attacking the bloodline leading to Christ happened throughout bible history. The attempt to pollute the bloodline began with the generations descended from Adam, the destruction of all in the flood with the exception of Noahs family, and then again with attacks on Abraham and later David as just some examples. Did the fallen angels take wives once again to onset more strange hybrids ( Giants) after the flood or were their corrupt seeds of Satan lingering in the bloodline of the family of Noah ?
I have one more question for you before the next chapter. If these so called Sons of God ( Sethite's) were Godly , why werent they on the ark with Noah ?
3 Giants
The bible says there were giants in the earth in those days; Gen:6:4 - Who were these giants ? What does giant mean ? How did they get there ? How tall were they ? The word appears in the King James Version as the translation of the Hebrew words nephilim ( Gen 6:4; Num 13:33 ); repha'im ( Deut 2:11,20; 3:11,13; Jos 12:4 , etc.); rapha' ( 1Chron 20:4,6,8 ), or raphah ( 2 Sam 21:16, 18, 20, 22 ); in one instance of gibbor, literally, "mighty one" ( Job 16:14 ). I could speak on the giants a lot but one thing I want to make clear; something outside the normal intention of God took place. God has made it clear that he does not want one species interbreeding with another ( Leviticus 19:19) but that is another study for another day).
Something had to infect the human gene pool to cause beings ( descendants ) to be unusually tall/big or " RENOWN". Humans that have different levels of morality or beliefs do not have children whose stature is so great beyond the norm to necessitate God to create a reference to a group of beings for said offspring ! These children ( all of them ) were destined to become a certain way upon adulthood. Doesnt sound like your usual children as you know of does it ? These children became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
Num:13:33: And there we saw the giants, the sons of Anak, which come of the giants: and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight.The Israelites mentioned that they were compared to the giants as grasshoppers and they felt the same way. One could only imagine how tall one would be to be referred to as something so small. There is no doubt that something infected the gene pool to create such tall and broad beings. Lets read Gen 6: 12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth. Interesting... the FLESH was corrupted, not morals, but FLESH ! Corrupted, contaminated.
The unholy union of fallen angels and humans brought on such a terrible genetic problem with these hybrids that all of mankind was " corrupted " yet for one man....Noah who was perfect ( clean ) in his ( generations/ geneology ). Nowhere in the bible are giants referred to as a " good " people giving more indication to having an evil ancestory. Again note this important fact... God did not say all morals or character was corrupt but said " ALL FLESH " was corrupt ! How very interesting !
A 19'6" human skeleton found in 1577 A.D. under an overturned oak tree in the Canton of Lucerne.
23-foot tall skeleton found in 1456 A.D. beside a river in Valence, France.
A 25' 6 " skeleton found in 1613 A.D. near the castle of Chaumont in France. This was claimed to be a nearly complete find. A 9' 8" skeleton was excavated from a mound near Brewersville, Indiana (Indianapolis News, Nov 10, 1975). In 1833 soldiers digging at a pit for a powder magazine in Lompock Rancho, California, discovered a male skeleton 12 feet tall. The skeleton was surrounded by carved shells, stone axes, and blocks of porphyry covered with unintelligible symbols. The skeleton had double rows of upper and lower teeth. These bones substantiated legends by the local Piute Indians regarding giants which they called Si-Te-Cahs. In Clearwater Minnesota, the skeletons of seven giants were found in mounds. These had receding foreheads and complete double dentition. A mound near Toledo, Ohio, held 20 skeletons, seated and facing east with jaws and teeth "twice as large as those of present day people," and besides each was a large bowl with "curiously wrought hieroglyphic figures." (Chicago Record, Oct. 24, 1895; cited by Ron G. Dobbins, NEARA Journal, v13, fall 1978). Almost beyond comprehension or believability was the find of the two separate 36-foot human remains uncovered by Carthaginians somewhere between 200-600 B.C.
There is no need in proving the existance of giants, especially when the bible says they were there. The question is how they got there and where did they go ?
Lets look at the era of time these Giants lived. The phrase in those days; and also after that is significant. Understanding the origin of these giants and the fact they have appeared several times in the course of history is important to learn. Those days were the days of Noah. These half angel and half human giants all died in the flood, yet the also after that shows other giants appeared. The Nephilim and later the Rephaim ( Gen 14:5, 15:20,2 Sam 5:18 etc..) are the descendants of fallen angels. The further reference in this verse to the sons of God helps explain these giants when you refer back to Genesis 6:2 to learn the origin of these superhuman and evil beings. These Nephilim are the offspring of fallen angels who came to earth and they took wives and had children. The genetic wave took hold of mankind and perpetuated itself through mankind along with the genetic code to cause all to think of evil "continually" ! Think about it..... not even a small break from thinking evily ! Even I " a human " takes breaks from thinking evil thoughts !
By studying all verses involving these giants, one begins to realize the massive size and power they possessed. Other words that describe these giants characterize them as evil beyond imagination, as well. Looking ahead from Genesis 6, the next chapter begins the story of Noah, the great flood, and the destruction of mankind. The evil influence of the fallen angels and their descendants brought the world into such utter moral decay, that God intended to destroy everyone with the exception of Noah and his family.
Rapha was the most prominent of the Nephilim, yet there were many other named giants including Anak, the root ancestor of the Anakims, and the last of the giants, Og the King of Bashan. Just how huge was Og? Heres a clue from the book of Deuteronomy: For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man. Deuteronomy 3:11 (KJV)
Og required a bed 9 4 cubits made of iron as described in the above verse, and for approximate modern measurements convert 1 cubit to 18 inches, or just under 1/2 meter (0.4572 meters). His bed was 13.5 feet long by 6 feet wide (4.1 meters by 1.83 meters). This giant descendant of a supernatural fallen angel was likely 12 feet tall minimum if you allow 18 inches to tuck his feet in at night !
4 ---Wives. How do fallen angels take wives ? I mean " who marrys them ". How does a female take hold of a husband that is a fallen angel or vice versa ? Right away I feel pretty silly even trying to answer the question wondering "hey honey, I'm home from work, whats for supper ?
What is defined as marriage ? The ceremony ? No God indicates a sexual union is marriage.
1 Cor 6: 15-18 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. We see here that when two are joined in a sexual union, there is also a spiritual union... and both shall be recognized as one flesh. The phrase that the sons of God took wives can also refer to fornication not just a marriage relationship (Judges 21:22; Leviticus 20:17). This indicates there did not have to be a formal marriage ceremony between the sons of God and the daughters of men.
Lets understand this. Angels in the bible often looked like human beings. They could eat with humans, hold their hands and even mix in the crowd unknowingly ( Heb 13:2) . But the bible says angels dont marry right ? Mathew 22:30 . For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven. The scripture also makes clear that these are angels OF God ! We are not talking about the angels OF God; those that give reverence to God.
I know I am repeating myself here in this study but these are things well worth repeating. Well first of all this scripture is talking about the resurection; a future event and secondly its talking about angels in heaven, not those who left their first estate ( heaven ) and went after strange flesh ( outside of heaven ). If this verse doesnt paint the picture on Gen 6 for you, you simply choose to ignore the facts ! Jude 1 6: And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.7: Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Strange flesh in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah obviously referred to flesh of a man with a man.. not according to Gods will. Fallen angels who had sex with the daughters of men were not according to Gods will.

Ok , but lets get back to the wives thing. Are the wives in Genesis 6 really wives as we understand them to be ? Here something to consider in Deuteronomy 22:28-29
If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found; Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days. -- There was a rule that when a man raped a woman he was ordered to take her as a wife. Isnt that barbaric? First, the Mosaic Law is hardly about letting a rapist off easy. The consequence for raping a woman engaged to be married was stoning (Deuteronomy 22:25). If the woman was not engaged, the rapist was spared for the sake of the womans security.
Having lost her virginity, she would have been deemed undesirable for marriageand in the culture of the day, a woman without a father or husband to provide for her would be subject to a life of abject poverty, destitution, and social ostracism. As such, the rapist was compelled to provide for the rape victim for as long as he lived. Thus, far from barbaric, the law was a cultural means of protection and provision. Furthermore, there was precedent under the Mosaic Law for the victimized woman not to marry the victimizer if her father determined that she could be provided for in a more suitable manner (Exodus 22:1617). Thus, the law was not designed to force the rape victim into an unbearable marriage, but to secure her future and that of her children. Finally, neither then nor now, there is no perfect resolution for a woman who has been violated through the horror of rape. The modernday solution of aborting a child conceived through rape only compounds the horror. Indeed, if we are completely satisfied by any earthly solutioneven the death penaltyour moral sensibilities are seriously skewed. Can we say this is why the bible says these " beings " took wives of all they chose ? I cant say. I cant prove anything here and will admit it. I can say that these sons of God took wives of all they chose which seems like the women didnt have a say in the matter.
The Bible doesn't list out exactly what God considered steps to a marriage except what I have covered already ( a sexual union ). As far as we can tell, He left it to the culture to decide about who marrys who, and the Bible doesn't spell out pre-Flood culture to any great degree.
It is very interesting to read Mathew 24:67 that whe Isaac took (( TAKE )) Rebekah into his tent ( and we know what this means ) the bible says THEN she became his wife. NOT BEOFRE. So evidently the act of copulation initiates the observance of marriage to God.
The word "take" can mean anything from marry to snatch to capture. One thing to keep in mind is that if the descendants of the "sons of God" were men of renown, think of what the sons of God themselves were like! It's possible that fathers wanted to get in good with these men and gave their daughters in marriage. But that's pure speculation..The Mosaic law spells out that if a girl willingly has sex with a man, her father can still decide if the man is worthy of his daughter. If not, she stays with her family. And when David's son raped his sister Ta mar, even though Tamar begged, her brother refused to take her into his house.
There were no equal rights in the ancient world. A violated woman was viewed as unclean and seen as not fit for marrying by anyone respectable. Because of this serious crime, the perpetrator was forced to pay a large fine and support the woman for the rest of her life. I don't believe the woman was required to marry him if she had a better option, but it says she was not pledged to be married. This suggests she had no other options.
Return of the days of Noah -
Now it becomes very spooky indeed. In the New Testament, 4 apostles were asking Jesus about the signs that would show just before his return and Jesus replied in Mt:24:37: But as the days of Noe ( Noah ) were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. Something happened in the days of Noah that was disctintive ; characteristic of Noahs time , that didnt happen before or after. Wars, famines, pesticlences and natural disasters have always happened. But something happened in the days of Noah that made it noteworthy enough that the time of his life was mentioned. The most sinister and bizarre of all things to happen was this intermarriage between an angelic race and the human race, and of course the master mind behind it all was Lucifer. I agree with many in their popular opinion that our generation is seeing thousands of reported alien abductions with their victims claiming that interbreeding is the centeralized subject matter of the abduction. This is nothing more than the retelling of the old testaments story of Genesis 6 !
What if Jesus reference to Mathew 24:37 was something more than just a reference to a certain period of time of the past but a reference to certain period of time because of something that took place in that era ? God could have wiped out the worlds population at anytime he chose but he just so happened to do it during a period where angelic beings were interbreeding with human females and giving birth to something worthy enough to take note of ! Any type of human could grow up and become one of a million of things to be called but this union was worthy of noting a name giving to it at birth ! Was Jesus insinuating that he meant just before his return that something would happen again as it did in the days of Noah ? The recent alien abductions seem to have began to take place back in the early 60s. Could this be a warning that something so sinister , so terrifying and deceptive that mens hearts would fail them by the sight of it ? Luke 21:26 Men's hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of heaven shall be shaken.
6 Nebuchadnezzars Dream - I will try my best to make this chapter short as possible and touch base on one particular scripture. Though the meaning will never be clear , it eludes to something quiet strange. Especially in light of what other key areas of the bible are eluding to. From now on King Nebuchdanezzar will referred to as KN. In Daniel 2, Daniel interprets a troubling dream of KN of Babylon. The dream is revealed in explicit detail. In the dream is a statue, head of gold, arms and chest of silver, belly and thighs of brass, and legs and feet of iron. The feet were also mentioned that the iron was mixed with miry clay. A stone cut without hands struck the image at its feet and crumbled and then the stone grew into a mountain which filled the whole earth. Strange dream huh ? KN wants Daniel to interpret the dream. Note" in Daniel 7 , Daniel recieved more visions which although used entirely different idioms, covered the same subject matter. These visions yield much of the essential background which illuminates the book of Revelation. The large metal image turns out to be a time line of the sequence of four major empires which will dominate the planet earth until the time of God sets up his own government. The era covered is called " The time of the Gentiles". The head of gold represented Babylon under the leadership of KN. The silver portion of the image referred to the empire wich would conquer Babylon, that is Persia. The fall of Babylon is detailed in Daniel 5. The brass portion represents the empire tha would conquer the persians, which were the Greeks. The iron image represented the empire which would conquer the Greeks..... the Romans. It is interesting that the Roman Empire ultimately split into two (two legs of the image ?) Who conquered the Romans ? ..noone ! About 476 AD the Roman Empire broke into pieces. Throughout subsequent European history, each piece has made a bid for global dominion without fully succeeding. The Dutch, the French ( under Charlemagne and later Napoleon ), the Germans ( under Bismark and later Hitler ), the Spanish with their Armada, the English as the mistress of the sea, all have had their day in the Sun. But none of them really established suzerainty in the same sense the Romans did. Daniels portrayel suggests that these " pieces" will untimately recombine before the end. This theme is echoed in many other passages and is oneof the reasons that some Bible commentators have, for centuries, looked for an ultimate revival of the Roman Empire, in some form at the time of the end. Some suggest that the current moves within the European Union may be setting up the state for this final government. This final empire represented by the 10 toes of iron mixed with miry clay is the subject of many passages dealing with the final climax. It will be in the days of the ten toes that the " stone cut without hands" will smite the image and set up Gods own government here on earth. BUT what is represented by the " miry clay" ? It seems to be strangely mixed , but not completely with the iron in the dream. The term miry clay refers to clay made from the dust, a biblical term that suggests death. ( The Raphaim, a tribal term for some of the giants is also a term that is often translated "death" ). What makes this famous prophecy especially suggestive is the strange allusion for verse Danel 2: verse 43. And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. Switching to the personal pronoun " they" shall mingle themselves with the seed of men. This is extremely suggestive when viewed in light of Genesis chapter 6. Just what or who is mingling with the seed of men ? Who is this outside the seed of men that are mingling with the seed of men ? It staggers the mind to contemplate the significance of Daniels passage and its implication for the future global governance. This vision of evil entities that have somehow embedded themselves in people who run our governments force us to scrutinize the passage Eph:6:12: For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. If you study this more ( which I wont here ) you will find that even many of our own American politicians are involved in things the bible clearly speaks against !

7. Book of Enoch. An interesting book left out from being added to the canon of scripture but an interesting read all the same. Why it wasnt included I do not know. Probably because it was simply to vivid and weird. The book itself was mentioned in the new testament book of Jude a few times and remember Jude was a half brother to Jesus. There were many things writting in the book of Enoch that matches perfectly with things that happened into history and some scientific knowledge revealed in the book was discovered long after the book was written.
Jude 1:14 Now Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied about these men also, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of His saints, [15] to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have committed in an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things which ungodly sinners have spoken against Him."
We first learn of Enoch in Genesis 5 but the bible leaves us with questions. Hebrews 11 has the answers and Jude quotes Enoch! How did Jude come to know the words of Enoch? They are not in the Bible. The answer of course, is The Book of Enoch. A book which is actually quoted by Jude in the New Testament. What is the Book of Enoch and where did it come from?
Enoch was the great-grandfather of Noah. The Book of Enoch chapter 68:1 "And after that my great-grandfather Enoch gave me all the secrets in the book and in the parables which had been given to him, and he put them together for me in the words of the book of the parables."
The Book of Enoch was extant centuries before the birth of Christ and yet is considered by many to be more Christian in its theology than Jewish. It was considered scripture by many early Christians. The earliest literature of the so-called "Church Fathers" is filled with references to this mysterious book. The early second century "Epistle of Barnabus" makes much use of the Book of Enoch. Second and Third Century "Church Fathers" like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Origin and Clement of Alexandria all make use of the Book of Enoch. Tertullian (160-230 C.E) even called the Book of Enoch "Holy Scripture". The Ethiopic Church even added the Book of Enoch to its official canon. It was widely known and read the first three centuries after Christ. This and many other books became discredited after the Council of Laodicea. And being under ban of the authorities, afterwards it gradually passed out of circulation.
The Book of Enoch (also known as 1 Enoch) was once cherished by Jews and Christians alike, this book later fell into disfavor with powerful theologians - precisely because of its controversial statements on the nature and deeds of the fallen angels.
Despite its unknown origins, Christians once accepted the words of this Book of Enoch as authentic scripture, especially the part about the fallen angels and their prophesied judgment. In fact, many of the key concepts used by Jesus Christ himself seem directly connected to terms and ideas in the Book of Enoch. Thus, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that Jesus had not only studied the book, but also respected it highly enough to adopt and elaborate on its specific descriptions of the coming kingdom and its theme of inevitable judgment descending upon "the wicked" - the term most often used in the Old Testament to describe the Watchers.
There is abundant proof that Christ approved of the Book of Enoch. Over a hundred phrases in the New Testament find precedents in the Book of Enoch.
The Book of Jude tells us in verse 14 that "Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied..." Jude also, in verse 15, makes a direct reference to the Book of Enoch (2:1), where he writes, "to execute judgment on all, to convict all who are ungodly..." The time difference between Enoch and Jude is approximately 3400 years. Therefore, Jude's reference to the Enochian prophesies strongly leans toward the conclusion that these written prophesies were available to him at that time.

Now to get on with the interesting stuff. The first chapter of Enoch starts out with a detailed explaination about angels literally poured onto the earth and mixing with humans !!! It gives a precise account of the fall of these angels . Now this is the part where you need to sit down ! An exerpt from Enoch which perfectly matches with the account of Genesis 6 !--And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.' And Semjz, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.' And they all answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.' Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders: Samazz, their leader, Arkba, Rml, Kkabl, Tml, Rml, Dnl, zql, Barqjl, Asl, Armrs, Batrl, Annl, Zaql, Samspl, Satarl, Trl, Jmjl, Saril. These are their chiefs of tens.
And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones. And Azzl taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals of the earth and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments, and the use of antimony, and the beautifying of the eyelids, and all kinds of costly stones, and all colouring tinctures. And there arose much godlessness, and they committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways. Semjz taught enchantments, and root-cuttings, 'Armrs the resolving of enchantments, Barqjl (taught) astrology, Kkabl the constellations, zql the knowledge of the clouds, Araqil the signs of the earth, Shamsil the signs of the sun, and Saril the course of the moon. And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven... And then Michael, Uriel, Raphael, and Gabriel looked down from heaven and saw much blood being shed upon the earth, and all lawlessness being wrought upon the earth. And they said one to another: 'The earth made without inhabitant cries the voice of their cryingst up to the gates of heaven. And now to you, the holy ones of heaven, the souls of men make their suit, saying, "Bring our cause before the Most High."'
And they said to the Lord of the ages: 'Lord of lords, God of gods, King of kings, and God of the ages, the throne of Thy glory (standeth) unto all the generations of the ages, and Thy name holy and glorious and blessed unto all the ages! Thou hast made all things, and power over all things hast Thou: and all things are naked and open in Thy sight, and Thou seest all things, and nothing can hide itself from Thee. Thou seest what Azzl hath done, who hath taught all unrighteousness on earth and revealed the eternal secrets which were (preserved) in heaven, which men were striving to learn: And Semjz, to whom Thou hast given authority to bear rule over his associates. And they have gone to the daughters of men upon the earth, and have slept with the women, and have defiled themselves, and revealed to them all kinds of sins. And the women have borne giants, and the whole earth has thereby been filled with blood and unrighteousness. And now, behold, the souls of those who have died are crying and making their suit to the gates of heaven, and their lamentations have ascended: and cannot cease because of the lawless deeds which are 11 wrought on the earth. And Thou knowest all things before they come to pass, and Thou seest these things and Thou dost suffer them, and Thou dost not say to us what we are to do to them in regard to these.' Then said the Most High, the Holy and Great One spake, and sent Uriel to the son of Lamech, and said to him: 'Go to Noah and tell him in my name "Hide thyself!" and reveal to him the end that is approaching: that the whole earth will be destroyed, and a deluge is about to come upon the whole earth, and will destroy all that is on it.
And now instruct him that he may escape and his seed may be preserved for all the generations of the world. ( a reference to Noahs perfect non tainted geneology), ' And again the Lord said to Raphael: 'Bind Azzl hand and foot, and cast him into the darkness: and make an opening in the desert, which is in Ddl, and cast him therein. And place upon him rough and jagged rocks, and cover him with darkness, and let him abide there for ever, and cover his face that he may not see light. And on the day of the great judgement he shall be cast into the fire. And heal the earth which the angels have corrupted, and proclaim the healing of the earth, that they may heal the plague, and that all the children of men may not perish through all the secret things that the Watchers have disclosed and have taught their sons. And the whole earth has been corrupted ........................... ( and much more is written about this ! )
As you can see, those who are in the camp that believe Genesis 6 mentions that fallen angels interbreeded with mankind is supported by the book of Enoch. Even the " assumption" that Noah was chosen because we was "perfect" in his generations is supported by the book of Enoch.

8 , Wiping out Satans Genepool - Ever wonder why God ordered the Israelites to go into a nation and wipe everyone out, sometimes including the women and chidren ?........ UNFINISHED WORK .......... ( The word has wrestled with this for sure ) !!
In the Old Testament there are a number of instances of God telling Israel to completely wipe out the peoples who inhabited the land called Palestine (e.g. Deut 7:1-4,16,24). Doesnt that make the God of the Old Testament a harsh and unjust God, completely different from the God of love portrayed in the New Testament? First, the challenge is often about a God who orders genocide in respect of the occupants of Canaan, Anakim, Midianites....etc .Genocide, I would suggest, is the purposeful wiping out of a tribe, nation or people.
The Bibles descriptions of God are not at variance between Old and New Testaments.For example in the Old Testament we find God saying, The soul who sins is the one who will die. (Ezek 18:5)In the New Testament, we find the apostle, Paul, writing the wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23).However, in the Old Testament we also find God declaring, I take no pleasure in the death of anyone (Ezek 18:32). If you were to read atheist's websites, you will often find complaints that the God of the Bible arbitrarily ordered the destruction of entire cities, such as Jericho, just to allow the Jews to have a homeland in the Middle East. How could a loving God command the destruction of all those "innocent" people? The argument sounds good, but it is utterly false. The unstated assumption is that the people who God ordered destroyed were morally equivalent to the Jews, who replaced them. However, this is what the Bible says about the people who were destroyed:
"It is not for your righteousness or for the uprightness of your heart that you are going to possess their land, but it is because of the wickedness of these nations that the LORD your God is driving them out before you, in order to confirm the oath which the LORD swore to your fathers, to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. (Deuteronomy 9:5)
Okay, how "wicked" could those people have been? Well these people killed their own sons and daughters by burning them in sacrifices to their gods:
"You shall not behave thus toward the LORD your God, for every abominable act which the LORD hates they have done for their gods; for they even burn their sons and daughters in the fire to their gods. (Deuteronomy 12:31)
The wickedness of these people is confirmed in other verses of the Bible. So we see that these people are not quite as innocent as the atheists would like you to believe. The fact that these people practiced child sacrifice is also confirmed in the secular writings of the Greeks. Then again, maybe those atheists believe that killing your children is not all bad. After all, killing viable pre-born babies is legal in this country (it's called a choice, a.k.a. abortion). For these reasons (and others), God ordered the destruction of the peoples whom the Israelites dispossessed.
Did God kill any innocent people along with the evil ones? When God was about to destroy the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham asked God if He would destroy the cities if there were 50 righteous people in them. God said no. Then Abraham asked the same question if there were 45 righteous people. Every time he dropped the number and got the same answer. The fact is that God would not have destroyed those cities if there were any righteous people in them. The few righteous who were in those cities He warned ahead of time to get out. So, God does not destroy the righteous along with the evil.
In some instances, God ordered the killing of entire populations, presumably including the killing of babies and children. Isn't God unrighteous in killing these innocent little ones? First of all, the Bible indicates that all people are sinners, including babies, . HOLD ON TO YOUR HORSES ! However, the Bible also indicates that children are incapable of making moral choices, so that they are automatically rewarded with heaven. There is scripture to substantiate this .
So, in having babies killed, God is actually doing them a favor, since, if they had grown up opposed to God, they would have gone to hell. If God were to have spared some of the children, it would have been difficult to determine the cutoff age. A one-year old is probably still relatively uncorrupted by his parents, but what about a two-year old? I have personally seen a number of spoiled two-year olds who had already been corrupted by their parents. In a society where moral corruption abounds, the corruption of the children would be early and severe. God was very clear that he did not want the sons and daughters of the corrupted peoples to marry the sons and daughters of the Israelites to lead them astray through false worship. Even so, there are many examples of the Israelites being polluted in their worship by the surrounding peoples.
With all these people who were wiped out ( due to their unrighteousness, including their children), maybe it had something to do with the great flood whose purpose was to exterminate mankind due to those who were not perfect in their generations. If there was a demonic gene code from fallen angels or and their children, then those children were probably predestined to be evil like their ancestors with no redeeming qualities,.
9. CE4 Close enounters of the 3rd kind and beyond. Here we come to "my" final chapter of the alien abduction phenomona. Something is taken light to this mystery. Recently reports are coming in that some who have been abducted have called on the name of Jesus , which in turn has stopped thier abduction. This greatly strengthens my theory that aliens are no beings from another planet but demons who have disguised themselves as beings from another world. For a biblical example of the power of the name of Jesus we can read of the instance when Paul, the apostle, cast a demon out of a girl. "Paul, being grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command thee in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her. And he came out the same hour (Acts 16:18) If UFO abductions are mere illusions perpetrated by demons it is no wonder that they are halted by exercising spiritual authority through the name of Jesus.

Conclusion- If all the above is false, then what under Gods heaven is going on ? Flying things are scattered throught the bible, on ancient hyroglyphs, antique paintings and now people all over the world are claiming to be abducted by strange beings. Included in the abductions are the eerie fact that most are having sperm and eggs extracted from them. Some are later shown the "hybrid child" through many of its growing stages. Many are allowed to hold their own babies. This is all too strange to be coincidence. Why is this happening ? Pure speculation here but if the premillenial tribulation theorists are correct, Christians will vanish off the face of the earth and something has to take place to restore order to those who are left behind. Their will be extreme chaos worldwide and answers will be demanded. What better a time for demons ( fallen angels ) to come down from UFOs and tell the world those crazy christians and their higher than thou attitudes have been removed and that their real creators and space brothers are now here with a plan to move the human race to a higher level of conscience and peace. Since these remaining humans have been desensitized from years of UFO movies, theories, space brother reports, books etc, they will ingest the reasoning without question. Gods great deception that is coming on this earth will take the world by storm.

This is a very short study of amazing study that can last one a lifetime. Hopefully this will jump start your interest in investigating this phenomona. Below is my hypothesis of what I see happening. A very crude guess you might say. If you have a better one, let me know.
Satan can not create life and throughout history he has being trying to mimick God in everything he does. The closest thing he can do is to alter the genetic code producing offspring of himself. He has been doing this at least since the first encounter of genetic maniupulation back in the days of Noah. Interesting to note that many men and women who claim to have been abducted report sperm and ovum taken. Some women have even been shown their babies months have a latter abduction has taken place to remove the embryo or fetus. Some women and men have claimed to see young children who were part of this breeding program and asked to hold these children and show affection toward them. Very strange indeed. That is fact. More guesswork goes into future events. After the rapture happens the world will be in chaos. Christians wont be here to explain what has happened or why. These aliens will appear in mass numbers along with these "human" offspring to announce to the world that they are our space ancestors and are here to make things right. The Christians have been taken away to allow a more universal system of advancement of higher reasoning and higher consciousness. These " altered humans " will do work to fulfill these aliens ( fallen angels ) agenda which will be to keep those left behind decieved all the way into hell. Because of the very believable story, most of the world will fall for it. Their will be some unsaved souls who know the truth from listening to those who tried to share the truth with them. They and anyone who opposes these aliens ( fallen angels) will be persecuted probably till death. Rv:20:4
A great commission of the 144,000 ( another study ) will be protected from death and will spread the gospel during the tribulation but at this time the big difference is that those who come to know Christ after the tribulation starts will be beheaded ( Rv:20:4 ) for their faith if they dont take the mark of the ( beast Rv:14:9) !
Mathew 24:13-14 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved. And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.
This is my assumption of what the Great Deception that is coming upon the Earth to test everyone.

One more final thought for Doug Batchelors teaching of beings on other worlds. In Genesis 3:20 the bible says that Eve is the mother of all living. If this is so ( as the Holy Ghost inspired Moses to write these words ) it means that if there are intelligent life on other worlds, then Eve is the mother of them. So if this is so how do we figure out that happened ? ! And Doug Batchelor also teaches that these beings ( he says this many times ) are UNFALLEN beings. So Mr. Batchelor, what about the verse thats say for ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God ?

Youll get accurate, biblical answers to difficult Bible questions. Join Pastor Doug Sunday nights at 7:00pm Pacific. Call 1-800-GOD-SAYS during the broadcast to have your question answered live on the air! This program broadcasts live from 7:00 - 8:00 PM PST Sunday evenings.
One very final thought . Pastor Batchelor says the Sons of God are the godly line of Seth and the Daughters of Men are the ungodly line of Cain.
The book of Genesis uses the name " Seth " 7 times and the name Cain 13 times.
Here are two questions...
Why do you think God chose not to use the names Seth and Cain in Genesis 6 when He used those names in other places of Genesis. You said the the sons of Seth were godly men. My last question is : if they were Godly , why did they drown in the flood ?

I sent a rep at Amazing Facts Ministry 2 simple questions. And please read the astounding reply I recieved !
Dear Amazing Facts Ministry.... I am a big supporter of the Angelic view of Genesis 6. Without it much of the bible is confusing. But onward to the question. Pastor Batchelor teaches the Sethite view of Genesis 6. Heres my question. Gen:6:4: There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.---- If these giants/nephilim were the decendants of the line of Seth and Cain, how were MORE of them born AFTER the decendants of Seth and Cain were wiped out in the flood ?
1 more please. How do ( moralistically speaking ) godly and ungodly humans create giants ?
Thank you .
Holland Shoaf
Hello Holland, thanks for your questions.
First my friend angels are spirits and asexual, they cannot consummate. The flood did not happen until about 1660 years after creation. Adam and Even, Seth, Cain and Abel were all giants approaching the height of 14-16 feet. The genes for gianthood were carried by Noah and Shem and when the Hebrews fought in the land of Canaan it still had giants but not as tall as Adam and Eve.
Warm Christian regards,
Dr. Stan Hatkoff, PhD
Amazing Facts Team
A reflection to Dr Hartkoff's reply. Here is a perfect example of what happens when a faulty doctrine is created about the Sons of God being the decendants of Seth. They have to create ridiculous ideas that do NOT
mesh with what the rest of the bible says on the subject. They just expect you to believe that point blank proclamation without any reason or details to follow. So..... not in any particular order. The bible said " they were giants in the earth in those days....." The bible did NOT say " everyone were giants in the earth in those days " . Prety simple huh ? The bible ( God ) took note to make this addition as being something OUT OF THE NORM.... NOT something that was normal. The bible continues on to say these giants existed AFTER the flood. Another fact implying that giants were not norm of the day. Caleb said " we were grasshoppers in their sight". Now think about that for a few seconds. For their to be giants ( who were the norm according to Dr. Hatkoff ) would have to be walking on the earth at the SAME TIME as the Israelites who somehow obtained a giant ( no pun intended ) leap to becoming VERY VERY much shorter in height. HOW could this have happened Dr. Hatkoff ?? And if there was some type of shrinkage of mankind back then, why arent we the size of ants now ? Nothing makes sense with claiming Adam was 14 feet tall.

Addition !! This pastor explains how the Giants ( continued to thrive ) after the flood !
This story gets spookier the more I learn about it !
Were the sons of God in Genesis 6 fallen angels? Who were the Nephilim

IF your are interested still after reading this please visit ...
More things to consider...

other sizes: small medium original auto
comment | share