photo sharing and upload picture albums photo forums search pictures popular photos photography help login
All Cameras >> Sigma >> Sigma 18-125mm F3.5-5.6 DC IF ASP

Sigma 18-125mm F3.5-5.6 DC IF ASP Lens Sample Photos

v3/87/331787/1/50422616.95_small.jpg
Marketed: 16-Mar-2004
Lens: 18-125mm
Random Sigma 18-125mm F3.5-5.6 DC IF ASP Samples from 6092 available Photos more
g1/85/574785/3/111126551.vmbpOM7X.jpg v3/13/288013/3/46621561.OilHeritageParade0011.jpg g3/32/199232/3/58283926.4.504.06174.jpg g6/45/522445/3/80336364.VngiJQvQ.jpg
g6/99/380799/3/41853050.leNV8nAj.jpg u16/rogerwiedyk/medium/42061269.jnjb0047.jpg u17/yorkie/medium/42377530.IMG_00881200X800.jpg g6/99/380799/3/45982089.vrNYu7eL.jpg
g4/37/598237/3/60159666.IMG_5839.jpg g6/92/558392/3/69586632.C35ch8LZ.jpg g1/92/558392/3/112066608.h6oRn3wk.jpg g3/32/199232/3/55522570.25.01.06008.jpg


Comments
Raf29-Jan-2007 18:36
This is a cheap and versatale walk-around lens, light, fairly sharp images and a good price/performance rate. The colour and contrast reproduction are not of the same qualitity level as my Canon 350D. I only use it on travelling light.
Bob White18-Apr-2006 13:12
Take a look and see what you think
http://www.pbase.com/robertwhite/thefirstshots
Bob White18-Apr-2006 12:27
Recently brought this lens and I am well pleased, it makes an excellent walkabout lens and has a very good range and performs well
PiXeL13-Oct-2005 16:07
Update: Was able to exchange at shop and new copy is WAY better...
Unfortunately I didn't keep any of the old images to compare.
http://www.pbase.com/evandavies/root
PiXeL07-Oct-2005 01:57
Ok, I think I was a little upset before but I'm better now ;)
Its not that bad but the FZ20 is better quality in most shooting conditions except of course in very low light when higher ISO is necessary.
Sorry for the rant... :|
PiXeL06-Oct-2005 17:30
I just bought a Sigma 18-125 for my 350D based partly on images seen here.
WHAT A DISSAPOINTMENT!!! I may have a bad copy because images are quite soft. :(
My FZ-20 images are sharper and have richer colours. I think you'd have to spend about 3X or 4X the price of the FZ-20 (or any good P&S) to get better images from a DSLR.
I may send the lens to Sigma and see what they have to say.
Can anyone send me an image or 100% crop of a sharp example with no modification....
A bit upset... evandavies1@hotmail.com
Guest 11-Sep-2005 13:11
Hello,
i'm wondering reading the positive comments here. Via camera search i wasn't able to find even ONE sharp photo taken with this lens here. Weird.
Guest 11-Sep-2005 13:10
Hello,
i'm wondering reading the positive comments here. Via camera search i wasn't able to find even ONE sharp photo taken with this lens here. Weird.
Guest 30-Jun-2005 05:54
I'm lens snob. Other lenses owned included Canon 16-35 f2.8 L, Canon 50mm 1.4, Tamron 28-75, and Canon 70-200 f4/L). But I still own and am very happy with the Sigma 18-125. It's an incredibly versatile range, light, and reasonably priced. Does it take images with the same sharpness and color depth & contrast as the L glass? No. But it does do remarkably well and makes a great walk-around lens when you need the very flexible range and a light lens.
Guest 28-Jun-2005 07:20
http://www.pbase.com/barisdiker/swimsunrise
Guest 17-May-2005 05:57
I had this lens once... its a excellent deal. Very fair price and excellent photos
Argishti Khachik17-Dec-2004 11:29
IMHO, this is one great lens for it's price.
Argishti Khachik17-Dec-2004 11:29
IMHO, this is one great lens for it's price.
Guest 16-Oct-2004 19:51
Very good lens for it's price.
Good range, good AF, sharp and light.
Christin Tröger05-Oct-2004 08:43
Great lens, sharp and nice colours.
Makes a good standard lens.
Dom Burke25-Jul-2004 20:20
relocated to: www.pbase.com/dom277/new_pics
Dom Burke13-Jul-2004 11:35
Very pleased with this lens.
Couple of smaple shots here...
http://www.pbase.com/dom277/sigma_18_125_crops

All photos are copyrighted and may not be used without permission from the photographer.
These photos are are a guide to what these cameras are capable of, but may not fully represent the camera due to post-processing, scanning, or photographic technique.
All brands are trademarked by their owners.
These pages are not sponsored or approved by the manufacturers.
Other content Copyright © 2003,2004,2005,2006, pbase.com LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Contact cameras@pbase.com to contribute data or photos of cameras.